"unstable" . . "Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff." . . "2008-11-13"^^ . . . "\n Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff.\n This is in development. \n Some other ontologies to look at:\n * http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/crypto\n + has cwm builtins: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/Trust\n - a bit old perhaps. It imports daml+oil\n - would help to be more completely specified\n - uses literals as subjects a little liberally, which makes this a \n bit difficult to work with frameworks that don't permit this\n * http://xmlns.com/wot/0.1/\n - limited very much to PGP (though on can map PGP to X509)\n - a little coarse grained, mixes up the PGP certificate with the PGP\n public key\n *\n Todo: \n - add some classes and relations for DSA\n - should this all be in one file? Or should this be cut up a little? Say one file for the general CERT ontology, and then files for RSA, DSA, PGP, etc... Or perhaps it does not really matter?\n - expand more on the certification side of things\n - verify this by security experts\n - owl2 has some constructs for combined inverse functional properties. \n This may be useful to use in defining an RSA key which is identified\n by two numbers.\n - also create html version of the spec by using this as a template.\n - should comments such as this be in html?\n "@en . . .