This HTML5 document contains 33 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n21https://kar.kent.ac.uk/88878/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n17https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/88878#
n2https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/
wdrshttp://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#
n18http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/status/
dchttp://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n13https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/subject/
n19https://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/raw.githubusercontent.com/annajordanous/CO644Files/main/
n10http://eprints.org/ontology/
bibohttp://purl.org/ontology/bibo/
n16https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/publication/
n12https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n15doi:10.1016/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n7https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/document/
n11https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n9https://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/akj22/materials/CO644/
n4https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/person/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:88878
rdf:type
bibo:Article bibo:AcademicArticle n10:EPrint n10:ArticleEPrint
rdfs:seeAlso
n21:
owl:sameAs
n15:j.cose.2021.102387
n10:hasAccepted
n7:3241728
n10:hasDocument
n7:3241781 n7:3241733 n7:3241778 n7:3241779 n7:3241780 n7:3241728
dc:hasVersion
n7:3241728
dcterms:title
Developing a Cyber Security Culture: Current Practices and Future Needs
wdrs:describedby
n9:export_kar_RDFN3.n3 n19:export_kar_RDFN3.n3
dcterms:date
2021-06-30
dcterms:creator
n4:ext-60ebaf5547346b7ae2398a3c8fcec662 n4:ext-j.r.c.nurse@kent.ac.uk n4:ext-28118c2dcde969378ee23c923c5559d9 n4:ext-115330f140d4af27a532c7049c7bfe3e
bibo:status
n18:peerReviewed n18:published
dcterms:publisher
n12:ext-f308aad1ef8f70546c3a197f104f2ad5
bibo:abstract
While the creation of a strong security culture has been researched and discussed for decades, it continues to elude many businesses. Part of the challenge faced is distilling pertinent, recent academic findings and research into useful guidance. In this article, we aim to tackle this issue by conducting a state-of-the-art study into organisational cyber security culture research. This work investigates four questions, including how cyber security culture is defined, what factors are essential to building and maintaining such a culture, the frameworks proposed to cultivate a security culture and the metrics suggested to assess it. Through the application of the PRISMA systematic literature review technique, we identify and analyse 58 research articles from the last 10 years (2010-2020). Our findings demonstrate that while there have been notable changes in the use of terms (e.g., information security culture and cyber security culture), many of the most influential factors across papers are similar. Top management support, policy and procedures, and awareness for instance, are critical in engendering cyber security culture. Many of the frameworks reviewed revealed common foundations, with organisational culture playing a substantial role in crafting appropriate cyber security culture models. Questionnaires and surveys are the most used tool to measure cyber security culture, but there are also concerns as to whether more dynamic measures are needed. For practitioners, this article highlights factors and models essential to the creation and management of a robust security culture. For research, we produce an up-to-date characterisation of the field and also define open issues deserving of further attention such as the role of change management processes and national culture in an enterprise's cyber security culture.
dcterms:isPartOf
n11:repository n16:ext-01674048
dcterms:subject
n13:T n13:QA n13:BF n13:H
bibo:authorList
n17:authors