This HTML5 document contains 42 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n21https://kar.kent.ac.uk/82894/
n2https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/
wdrshttp://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#
n17http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/status/
dchttp://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n14https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/subject/
n19https://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/raw.githubusercontent.com/annajordanous/CO644Files/main/
n3http://eprints.org/ontology/
bibohttp://purl.org/ontology/bibo/
n18https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/publication/
n16https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n10doi:10.1371/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n4https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/document/
n15https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n13https://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/akj22/materials/CO644/
n8https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/person/
n6https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/82894#

Statements

Subject Item
n2:82894
rdf:type
n3:ArticleEPrint bibo:AcademicArticle n3:EPrint bibo:Article
rdfs:seeAlso
n21:
owl:sameAs
n10:journal.pcbi.1008286
n3:hasAccepted
n4:3216264
n3:hasDocument
n4:3216264 n4:3216265 n4:3216286 n4:3216287 n4:3216288 n4:3216289 n4:3240953 n4:3240963 n4:3240968 n4:3240969 n4:3240970 n4:3240971
n3:hasPublished
n4:3240953
dc:hasVersion
n4:3240953 n4:3216264
dcterms:title
Breaking the Circularity in Circular Analyses: Simulations and Formal Treatment of the Flattened Average Approach
wdrs:describedby
n13:export_kar_RDFN3.n3 n19:export_kar_RDFN3.n3
dcterms:date
2020-11-23
dcterms:creator
n8:ext-j.l.brooks@kent.ac.uk n8:ext-5a093919d523f39a3187787e97122930 n8:ext-aoh3@kent.ac.uk n8:ext-32c7681fce3bbac704d44320b6e02b1b n8:ext-h.bowman@kent.ac.uk
bibo:status
n17:peerReviewed n17:published
dcterms:publisher
n16:ext-72433582b3abfd9f3b74d94a6e694560
bibo:abstract
There has been considerable debate and concern as to whether there is a replication crisis in the scientific literature. A likely cause of poor replication is the multiple comparisons problem. An important way in which this problem can manifest in the M/EEG context is through post hoc tailoring of analysis windows (a.k.a. regions-of-interest, ROIs) to landmarks in the collected data. Post hoc tailoring of ROIs is used because it allows researchers to adapt to inter-experiment variability and discover novel differences that fall outside of windows defined by prior precedent, thereby reducing Type II errors. However, this approach can dramatically inflate Type I error rates. One way to avoid this problem is to tailor windows according to a contrast that is orthogonal (strictly parametrically orthogonal) to the contrast being tested. A key approach of this kind is to identify windows on a fully flattened average. On the basis of simulations, this approach has been argued to be safe for post hoc tailoring of analysis windows under many conditions. Here, we present further simulations and mathematical proofs to show exactly why the Fully Flattened Average approach is unbiased, providing a formal grounding to the approach, clarifying the limits of its applicability and resolving published misconceptions about the method. We also provide a statistical power analysis, which shows that, in specific contexts, the fully flattened average approach provides higher statistical power than Fieldtrip cluster inference. This suggests that the Fully Flattened Average approach will enable researchers to identify more effects from their data without incurring an inflation of the false positive rate.
dcterms:isPartOf
n15:repository n18:ext-1553734X
dcterms:subject
n14:BF n14:RC0321
bibo:authorList
n6:authors
bibo:issue
11
bibo:volume
16