This HTML5 document contains 31 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n18https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/82232#
n15https://kar.kent.ac.uk/82232/
n2https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/
wdrshttp://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#
dchttp://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
n7http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/status/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/subject/
n12https://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/raw.githubusercontent.com/annajordanous/CO644Files/main/
n3http://eprints.org/ontology/
n17https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/event/
bibohttp://purl.org/ontology/bibo/
n13https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/publication/
n22https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n4https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/document/
n10https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n21https://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/akj22/materials/CO644/
n20doi:10.1145/
n9https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/person/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:82232
rdf:type
n3:BookSectionEPrint n3:EPrint bibo:BookSection bibo:Article
rdfs:seeAlso
n15:
owl:sameAs
n20:3377930.3390231
n3:hasAccepted
n4:3213682
n3:hasDocument
n4:3213690 n4:3213691 n4:3213682 n4:3213687 n4:3213688 n4:3213689
dc:hasVersion
n4:3213682
dcterms:title
A robust experimental evaluation of automated multi-label classification methods
wdrs:describedby
n12:export_kar_RDFN3.n3 n21:export_kar_RDFN3.n3
dcterms:date
2020-06-01
dcterms:creator
n9:ext-5b404a33afb1be275360d7d4d892214d n9:ext-388e566a13373bdf17bcac088017b03e n9:ext-a.a.freitas@kent.ac.uk n9:ext-dfd61717f3fa828b4c745ebf7adddd50
bibo:status
n7:peerReviewed n7:published
dcterms:publisher
n22:ext-2af1883e4bbfa0356fcedb366171cb38
bibo:abstract
Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) has emerged to deal with the selection and configuration of algorithms for a given learning task. With the progression of AutoML, several effective methods were introduced, especially for traditional classification and regression problems. Apart from the AutoML success, several issues remain open. One issue, in particular, is the lack of ability of AutoML methods to deal with different types of data. Based on this scenario, this paper approaches AutoML for multi-label classification (MLC) problems. In MLC, each example can be simultaneously associated to several class labels, unlike the standard classification task, where an example is associated to just one class label. In this work, we provide a general comparison of five automated multi-label classification methods - two evolutionary methods, one Bayesian optimization method, one random search and one greedy search - on 14 datasets and three designed search spaces. Overall, we observe that the most prominent method is the one based on a canonical grammar-based genetic programming (GGP) search method, namely Auto-MEKAGGP. Auto-MEKAGGP presented the best average results in our comparison and was statistically better than all the other methods in different search spaces and evaluated measures, except when compared to the greedy search method.
dcterms:isPartOf
n10:repository n13:ext-a8e1e3da1af1efaab4686bfcb385c7de
dcterms:subject
n8:Q335
bibo:authorList
n18:authors
bibo:presentedAt
n17:ext-b8623e69ece29bccbf7b0c320867105d