This HTML5 document contains 36 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n2https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/
wdrshttp://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#
dchttp://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
n19http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/status/
n12https://kar.kent.ac.uk/66579/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n14https://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/raw.githubusercontent.com/annajordanous/CO644Files/main/
n7http://eprints.org/ontology/
bibohttp://purl.org/ontology/bibo/
n18https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/publication/
n6https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/org/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n16doi:10.1016/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n8https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/document/
n10https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n17https://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/akj22/materials/CO644/
n5https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/person/
n9https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/66579#

Statements

Subject Item
n2:66579
rdf:type
bibo:AcademicArticle n7:ArticleEPrint n7:EPrint bibo:Article
rdfs:seeAlso
n12:
owl:sameAs
n16:j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.014
n7:hasAccepted
n8:983927
n7:hasDocument
n8:983927 n8:1714898 n8:1714899 n8:1714895 n8:1714896 n8:1714897
dc:hasVersion
n8:983927
dcterms:title
The impact of sample size on the reproducibility of voxel-based lesion-deficit mappings
wdrs:describedby
n14:export_kar_RDFN3.n3 n17:export_kar_RDFN3.n3
dcterms:date
2018-03-15
dcterms:creator
n5:ext-9273b926fb1d277317c0aacd199bbd3e n5:ext-f4fabf70821c51650c653486d00e4ee9 n5:ext-a9902f5d2fa1eefa5d2ffb4fa5ff36b9 n5:ext-3ae82eabec2854ca996566d388d7137a n5:ext-bcabab8595a87588cdaacab8474868e9 n5:ext-eff57698034dd2dfe340db59c84ebbd9 n5:ext-7f65d538a90c4773c18c99ea26517301 n5:ext-016795c5c4f8583677031fda0ab2fbaa n5:ext-307794627adb4e82ea09983575178c2a n5:ext-88cdf83a91c2d075a4485475b23a67fa n5:ext-h.bowman@kent.ac.uk
bibo:status
n19:peerReviewed n19:published
dcterms:publisher
n6:ext-f308aad1ef8f70546c3a197f104f2ad5
bibo:abstract
This study investigated how sample size affects the reproducibility of findings from univariate voxel-based lesion-deficit analyses (e.g., voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and voxel-based morphometry). Our effect of interest was the strength of the mapping between brain damage and speech articulation difficulties, as measured in terms of the proportion of variance explained. First, we identified a region of interest by searching on a voxel-by-voxel basis for brain areas where greater lesion load was associated with poorer speech articulation using a large sample of 360 right-handed English-speaking stroke survivors. We then randomly drew thousands of bootstrap samples from this data set that included either 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, or 360 patients. For each resample, we recorded effect size estimates and p values after conducting exactly the same lesion-deficit analysis within the previously identified region of interest and holding all procedures constant. The results show (1) how often small effect sizes in a heterogeneous population fail to be detected; (2) how effect size and its statistical significance varies with sample size; (3) how low-powered studies (due to small sample sizes) can greatly over-estimate as well as under-estimate effect sizes; and (4) how large sample sizes (N ? 90) can yield highly significant p values even when effect sizes are so small that they become trivial in practical terms. The implications of these findings for interpreting the results from univariate voxel-based lesion-deficit analyses are discussed.
dcterms:isPartOf
n10:repository n18:ext-00283932
bibo:authorList
n9:authors