This HTML5 document contains 10 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

Prefix	IRI
dcterms	http://purl.org/dc/terms/
n3	http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns#
foaf	http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
wdrs	http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#
rdfs	http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
cert	http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#
n6	http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/
rdf	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n8	http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/
n10	http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card#
owl	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n12	http://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/http/www.w3.org/ns/auth/
xsdh	http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#

Statements

Subject Item

cert:

rdf:type

owl:Ontology

dcterms:created

2008-11-13

rdfs:label

Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff.

rdfs:comment

Ontology for Certificates and crypto stuff. This is in development. Some other ontologies to look at: * http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/crypto + has cwm builtins: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/Trust - a bit old perhaps. It imports daml+oil - would help to be more completely specified - uses literals as subjects a little liberally, which makes this a bit difficult to work with frameworks that don't permit this * http://xmlns.com/wot/0.1/ - limited very much to PGP (though on can map PGP to X509) - a little coarse grained, mixes up the PGP certificate with the PGP public key * Todo: - add some classes and relations for DSA - should this all be in one file? Or should this be cut up a little? Say one file for the general CERT ontology, and then files for RSA, DSA, PGP, etc... Or perhaps it does not really matter? - expand more on the certification side of things - verify this by security experts - owl2 has some constructs for combined inverse functional properties. This may be useful to use in defining an RSA key which is identified by two numbers. - also create html version of the spec by using this as a template. - should comments such as this be in html?

rdfs:seeAlso

n6:foaf-protocols n8:X509Uml.svg n8:rsa

foaf:maker

n10:me

wdrs:describedby

n12:cert

n3:term_status

unstable