About: The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions

Not logged in : Login

(Sponging disallowed)

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : bibo:AcademicArticle, within Data Space : linkeddata.uriburner.com:28898 associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	http://eprints.org/ontology/ArticleEPrint http://eprints.org/ontology/EPrint Article Academic Article
seeAlso	HTML Summary of #73743 The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions
sameAs	The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions
http://eprints.org/ontology/hasAccepted	The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions (PDF)
http://eprints.org/ontology/hasDocument	The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions (PDF) The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions (Other) The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions (Other) The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions (Other) The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions (Other) The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions (Other)
dc:hasVersion	The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions (PDF)
Title	The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions
described by	https://demo.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/raw.githubusercontent.com/annajordanous/CO644Files/main/export_kar_RDFN3.n3
Date	2019-05-08
Creator	Oliver Buckley Jason R. C. Nurse
status	peer reviewed published
Publisher	Elsevier
abstract	There is an increasing shift in technology towards biometric solutions, but one of the biggest barriers to widespread use is the acceptance by the users. In this paper we investigate the understanding, awareness and acceptance of biometrics by the general public. The primary research method was a survey, which had 282 respondents, designed to gauge public opinion around biometrics. Additionally, qualitative data was captured in the form of the participants' definition of the term biometrics. We applied thematic analysis as well as an automated Word Vector analysis to this data to provide a deeper insight into the perceptions and understanding of the term. Our results demonstrate that while there is generally a reasonable level of understanding of what biometrics are, this is typically limited to the techniques that are most familiar to participants (e.g., fingerprints or facial recognition). Most notably individuals' awareness overlooks emerging areas such as behavioural biometrics (e.g., gait). This was also apparent when we compared participants' views to definitions provided by official, published sources (e.g., ISO, NIST, OED, DHS). Overall, this article provides unique insight into the perceptions and understanding of biometrics as well as areas where users may lack knowledge on biometric applications.
Is Part Of	Journal of Information Security and Applications https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/repository
Subject	H Social Sciences QA Mathematics (inc Computing science)
list of authors	https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/73743#authors
volume	47
is topic of	https://raw.githubusercontent.com/annajordanous/CO644Files/main/export_kar_RDFN3.n3
is primary topic of	HTML Summary of #73743 The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git144 as of Jul 26 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: iSPARQL | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Aug 25 2024, on Linux (x86_64-ubuntu_noble-linux-glibc2.38-64), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 16 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software