Not logged in : Login
(Sponging disallowed)

About: Creativity vs quality: why the distinction matters when evaluating computational creativity systems     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : bibo:AcademicArticle, within Data Space : linkeddata.uriburner.com:28898 associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
seeAlso
http://eprints.org/ontology/hasAccepted
http://eprints.org/ontology/hasDocument
dc:hasVersion
Title
  • Creativity vs quality: why the distinction matters when evaluating computational creativity systems
described by
Date
  • 2018-03-05
Creator
status
Publisher
abstract
  • The evaluation of computational creativity systems is increasingly becoming part of standard practice in computational creativity research, particularly with recent development in evaluation tools. One matter that can cause confusion, however, is in distinguishing between the concepts of creativity and quality/value. These two concepts are highly interrelated, to the point that it is difficult (and perhaps inappropriate) to define creativity without incorporat- ing quality judgements into that definition. Several examples exist, however, where creativity evaluation has been confused with quality judgments, leading to less grounded evaluative results. Many computational creativity projects aim to produce high quality results; this is a worthy research aim. If, however, the aim of a computational creativity research project is to make as creative a system as possible, then a more careful approach is needed that acknowledges and understands the differences - and also the overlaps - between creativity and quality. This paper critically investigates the concepts of creativity and quality (and how they are related). It offers warning examples showing the dangers of conflating the two concepts. These are followed by practical examples of how to incorporate value judgements into the evaluation of creativity of software, to further our overall pursuit of building more creative computational systems.
Is Part Of
Subject
list of authors
presented at
is topic of
is primary topic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git151 as of Feb 20 2025


Alternative Linked Data Documents: iSPARQL | ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Mar 17 2025, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc25), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 15 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software